Wednesday, 31 October 2018

Tired of fake news? How about fake Jews?

Or at least one fake Jew; as reported by Breaking Israel News, October 29, 2018:

Wolfgang Seibert has been leader of the Pinneberg’s 250-strong Jewish community since 2003. Recent German media reports said that Seibert claimed he was born in a displaced person’s camp and that his grandmother survived Auschwitz. Seibert was born a Protestant and baptized and has never converted to Judaism. As a result of the outcry, Seibert has resigned his post.
As reported by Benjamin Weinthal in the Jerusalem Post, October 21, 2018 (link inserted by blogger):

The 71-year-old chairman of the small Jewish community in the city of Pinneberg in the German state of Schleswig-Holstein faces an accusation from the magazine Der Spiegel that he is not Jewish, deceiving Jewish members since 2003.

Spiegel reported in this week’s issue that Wolfgang Seibert fabricated his Jewish origin and is a Protestant whose family members fought for Nazi Germany in World War II against the allied powers.

Seibert said he will consult with his attorney before issuing a public comment, adding that the contention that he plans to resign is false.

The Jewish community in Pinneberg, a city of more than 42,000 residents, numbers 250 members.

According to Spiegel, Seibert was born in 1947 as the son of the Protestant parents, and was baptized three days later. The magazine wrote that his grandparents were also Protestant.

Seibert claims that his grandmother, Anna Katharina Schmidt, whose birth last name was Marx, survived Auschwitz. The magazine wrote Seibert’s claim about his grandmother cannot be true because her grandfather was Protestant.

Jewish ancestors are not likely, added Spiegel, because Seibert’s grandfather on his father’s side was an officer in World War II and his father was an infantryman for Hitler’s army.

Seibert was previously convicted a number of times for fraud and embezzlement.

Seibert, according to the paper Die Welt, garnered media attention in 2014 when the Jewish community provided “asylum” for a Muslim refugee. The Pinneberg Jewish community represents liberal Judaism and Seibert has advocated Jewish-Christian dialogue over the years.

The case of Seibert’s alleged fake Jewish identity is not the first instance of non-Jewish Germans falsely depicting their religious background.

A number of cases of Germans, who pretended to be Jews and attacked the Jewish state, have surfaced over the years.

The Jerusalem Post revealed in 2016 a teacher, Christoph Glanz, in the German state of Lower Saxony, advocated a complete boycott of Israel posed as a Jew to sign a petition calling for all Palestinian refugees to be returned to the Jewish state.

The petition, titled “Jews for Palestinian Right of Return,” was located online and stated that “the Zionist regime officially denies the Nakba, the ethical equivalent of Holocaust denial.”

Michaela Engelmeier, a prominent Social Democratic politician, said at the time that Glanz is a “racist and antisemite.”

In 2012, a non-Jewish German poet and anti-Israel activist acknowledged that she fabricated her supposed service in the IDF during the First Lebanon War.

“I said I was in the IDF,” but “it was a lie,” said Irena Wachendorff, 51. She has called strong pro-Israel activists “the neo-Nazi troop among the Jews,” and expressed support for Hamas in the Gaza Strip.

Jennifer Pyka, a German investigative journalist in Munich, obtained evidence that contradicted Wachendorff’s alleged Jewish identity.

In 2010, Edith Lutz, a non-Jewish German who tried to break Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza aboard the catamaran Irene, said she converted to Judaism. The Irene was dubbed the “Jewish boat,” and garnered widespread media attention because of the presence of a small number of Jews onboard. Prominent German Jewish author and journalist Henryk M. Broder helped expose that Lutz did not convert to Judaism.

Tuesday, 30 October 2018

The latest LifeWay survey provides more evidence that many "Evangelicals" may not be Christians

There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death. Proverbs 14:12 (also Proverbs 16:25)

Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. John 14:6

Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man's device.
And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent:
Acts 17:29-30

I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain. Galatians 2:21

To say that God accepts the worship of all religions is to deny the words of the Lord Jesus Christ Himself. If God accepts the worship of all religions, then why did Jesus say He was the only way to the Father, and why did He die? As reported by Adam Eliyahu Berkowitz of Breaking Israel News, October 22, 2018 (links in original):

A recent survey of Evangelical Christians revealed that a majority of them acknowledge that God accepts the prayers of Jews. Although this seems to be a positive development in Jewish-Christian relations, the idea that basic tenets of Christianity can be cast aside is the source of serious concern for the Christian clergy.

The results of the 2018 State of Theology survey conducted by LifeWay Research was recently released. The survey asked 3,000 American Evangelicals about their theological beliefs. Fifty-one percent of respondents agreed with the statement that “God accepts the worship of all religions, including Christianity, Judaism, and Islam,” while 42 percent disagreed.

Chris Larson, president of Ligonier Ministries, told Christian Post that the results indicate “an urgent need for bold teaching of historic Christianity.”

“The State of Theology survey highlights the urgent need for courageous ministry that faithfully teaches the historic Christian faith,” Larson said in the interview. “It’s never been popular to talk about mankind’s sinfulness or the exclusive claims of Jesus Christ… but at a time when a darkened world needs the light of the Gospel, it’s disheartening to see many within the evangelical church confused about what the Bible teaches. We hope this survey provides local churches with a little more insight into what people in our neighborhoods and in our pews actually believe.”

“Indeed, among Christians who believe many religions can lead to eternal life, 80% name at least one non-Christian faith that can do so.

The Lifeway researchers noted that the results indicated that the majority of respondents did not accept one of Christianity’s core beliefs: it is only through accepting Jesus that a person can achieve salvation.

David Nekrutman, the executive director for the Center for Jewish-Christian Understanding and Cooperation (CJCUC), responded to the poll results with a question.

“Why are we blending salvation and worship?” Nekrutman asked rhetorically. “This survey asks if there is room within Christian thought that my prayers as a Jew to the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob will be accepted by God within Christian thought. Of course, there is no question that Jews believe their prayers are accepted. Judaism also holds that anyone who prays to the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, his prayers are accepted.”

Nekrutman noted that the Lifeway survey raises more questions than it answers.

“One question is ‘When a Christian comes to the Kotel (Western Wall), who does he think we are praying to?” Nekrutman asked. “Does he believe that all our prayers are automatically rejected by God?”

This recent survey seems to be more of a long-term trend among evangelicals toward accepting other religions than a temporary anomaly. A 2008 Pew Survey showed a majority of all American Christians (52 percent) think that at least some non-Christian faiths can lead to eternal life. The survey indicated that this Christian open-mindedness was primarily focused on Jews. The overwhelming majority (69 percent) of non-Jews who said that many religions can lead to salvation believed that Judaism can bring eternal life. Though evangelicals were less likely than other groups to say that non-Christian faiths can lead to eternal life, about two-thirds of evangelicals who did believe that there are multiple paths to salvation felt that Judaism can bring eternal life.

Tommy Waller, the founder of Hayovel, an organization that brings Christian volunteers to harvest grapes in Israel, was cautiously optimistic about the Lifeway survey results.

“This may be a product of progressiveness on Christianity,” Waller told Breaking Israel News. “This may be an attempt to make everybody happy, make everyone feel comfortable in the church. This results in not having a solid stance on anything, embracing some things which simply cannot coexist with faith in God and the Bible. A liberal mindset is very problematic.”

“There is a bit of positive in this,” Waller said. “I think Christianity needs to move toward accepting Judaism in Israel. As a Christian, I see a God connection in Jews returning, in the fulfillment of God’s covenant. Accepting this into my faith is not a rejection of any core faith. It is embracing what is written in the Bible; the Old Testament as well as the New Testament. In this respect, there is a significant difference between Islam and Judaism.”

“You can be too conservative, stuck in the old ways that are not relevant to changes that have taken place. I believe that Christians need to open their minds and their hearts. But for me, opening up does not mean not embracing every religion, but there is hope for every religion.

“Jesus prayed as a Jew, practiced Judaism in Israel, and loved the Temple,” Waller emphasized. “How can we, as Christians, reject that?”
See also my previous posts:

Today's Evangelicals, Tomorrow's Liberals--A Warning from 1983 (January 13, 2010)

More evidence that yesterday's liberalism has become today's evangelicalism (November 8, 2011)

More evidence that today's yesterday's evangelicals are tomorrow's today's liberals (January 24, 2015)

Monday, 29 October 2018

Religious liberals in Ohio use the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting as an occasion to promote syncretism

As horrible a crime as the October 27 mass shooting at Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh is, it doesn't justify unbiblical fellowships such as the event described in the following article. The fact that the person who gave the welcoming address at the is a woman with "Reverend" before her name gives a clue as to the liberal identity of the event and its participants. As reported by Mike Sigov of the Toledo Blade, October 29, 2018:

A northwest Ohio minister Monday called on people of different faiths to pray together in an effort to drive out hate.

Themed “Forgiveness,” the Sufi universal worship service was held at Payne Memorial AME Church in Holland in solidarity with the victims of the shooting at Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh.

“Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., once said, ‘Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.’ Perhaps none of us love that deeply and that actively. May we learn how... ,” said Judy Trautman, chairman of the MultiFaith Council of Northwest Ohio.

Formally organized in 2003, the council defines its mission as drawing together “diverse faith groups in fellowship, education, and collaborative service to the community.” Ms. Trautman, who is ordained as a Sufi minister, led the service.

The Rev. Rose Russell, who gave a welcome address, said the service was a “necessity.”

“At a time when faith traditions are challenged in the face of hate, we feel it is important that we find ways to pray together, not to sacrifice the beauty of our own traditions, but to unite them in love for all people,” organizers said in a prepared statement.

In a separate statement, the United Muslim Association of Toledo said: “In this hour of sadness, we offer our support to the sisters and brothers of the Jewish Community and pray to God Almighty for relief and healing.”

“When one of our faiths is attacked, all of us are attacked,” Ms. Trautman said. “We cannot remain silent. We must express that these hate crimes are not what we want our country to foment and represent.”

Participants of the event shared readings and music from seven faiths: Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh, Jewish, Christian, Islamic, and Baha’i.

They also lit a candle for each of the religions and for every victim of the synagogue shooting.

“I am here to show community support for the fallen and to support the concept of the unity of all people,” said Chuck Schafstall, 66, of Sylvania Township, one of about 80 people who attended the service.

Charmaine Benson, 28, of Toledo, another participant, echoed his words by saying she participated “for my community” and to express her “support for all people.”

“It is needed because it’s a pretty divided time, politically, socially, and racially,” she added.

Devorah Shulamit, of the Jewish Community Relations Council of the Jewish Federation of Greater Toledo, addressed event participants from the podium.

“This heinous act is unconscionable...,” Ms. Shulamit said. “Jewish law requires us to ask forgiveness for anyone who may have been harmed... And that a person must be quick to forgive... And should a sinner ask for forgiveness, we should forgive him willingly and wholeheartedly...”

“The Judaism... commands us, “Do not hate your brother in your heart!” she went on to say. “Sometimes it’s very difficult. And today is one of those times. So I ask for your understanding where I am coming from. And I will get there.”
The comment by Ms. Trautman that "when one of our faiths is attacked, all of us are attacked" is, of course, nonsense, because such crimes aren't equally spread among the various faith communities. The criminals in crimes such as this are attacking followers of a particular faith and aren't necessarily going to attack followers of other faiths.

Sunday, 28 October 2018

European Court of Human Rights upholds conviction of Austrian woman for stating an unpleasant truth about the false prophet Muhammad

Submitted for your approval: more evidence that Europe, like its North American offspring, is suicidally insane. While "human rights" activists support the legalization of blasphemy in Ireland on grounds of "freedom of speech," they oppose freedom of speech when it comes to criticizing the false prophet of Islam--and truth is no defense. The reader will notice the error of confusing blasphemy against God with criticism of a mere prophet, and a false one at that. The problem is that blasphemy isn't defined clearly enough to refer only to the God of the Bible, who is undoubtedly the God whom the lawmakers had in mind. The blasphemy laws were devised for and in countries that regarded themselves as Christian, and it never occurred to those who framed the laws--and could not reasonably have been foreseen by them--that hordes of foreign Muslims would invade their countries and then use the term "blasphemy" to refer to god(s) and "prophets" whom the ostensibly Christian lawmakers would have undoubtedly regarded as false.

As reported by
Conor Gallagher of the Irish Times, October 29, 2018:

A European court has upheld the blasphemy conviction of an Austrian woman who called the Prophet Muhammad a paedophile.

A seven-judge panel of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) which included an Irish judge, ruled the conviction of the woman, named as “Ms S”, did not violate her freedom of expression under article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The ruling on Thursday came the day before Ireland voted to remove a reference to blasphemy from the Constitution. Some 64.85 per cent voted to remove the reference while 35.15 per cent voted against the change.

Several European countries, including Austria where the conviction took place, continue to have strong laws against blasphemy. In Austria, Germany and Poland the offence carries a potential prison sentence as well as a fine.

Despite the presence of legalisation against blasphemy on the Irish Statute Book since 2009, no one has ever been prosecuted for the offence in the State. Legal sources said the Austrian woman’s comments would likely have technically formed an offence here, but charges would have been unlikely.

The prosecution would be dependent on gardaí finding enough people who were offended by the comments. In 2015, gardaí dropped an investigation into comedian Stephen Fry for saying God was “capricious, mean-minded and stupid” after they couldn’t find a large group of people offended by the comments.

The ECHR case centres on two seminars held by the woman in Vienna entitled “Basic Information on Islam”, where she told attendees the founder of Islam married a six-year-old girl and consummated the marriage when she was nine,

The woman said Muhammad “liked to do it with children” and “a 56-year-old and a six-year-old? . . . What do we call it, if it is not paedophilia?”.

In 2011, she was convicted of disparaging religious doctrines and ordered to pay a €480 fine and the costs of the case against her. An appeal against the conviction to the Austrian Supreme Court failed.

In considering whether the conviction violated the right to freedom of expression, the seven judges of the ECHR, including Irish member Síofra O’Leary, said people who practice a religion are not exempt from criticism.

However it also observed the subject matter of the case “was of a particularly sensitive nature” and the potential effects of such statements depend on which country they are made in.

There are about 339,000 Muslims in Austria, making up 4.2 per cent of the population.

The court said the Austrian authorities were in the best position to judge if such statements were likely to disturb the religious peace in their country.

It said the Austrian court’s decision “served the legitimate aim of preserving religious peace”.

The woman’s comments were not objective and had no intention of contributing to public debate, the ECHR said.

The comments “could only be understood as having been aimed at demonstrating that Muhammad was not worthy of worship”, according to a ECHR statement on its ruling.

The woman “must have been aware that her statements were partly based on untrue facts and apt to arouse indignation in others”.

“The national courts found that Ms S had subjectively labelled Muhammad with paedophilia as his general sexual preference, and that she failed to neutrally inform her audience of the historical background, which consequently did not allow for a serious debate on that issue.”

The court considered the woman’s argument that her comments occurred during an objective and lively public debate and were not designed to defame Islam. It said even comments made in a lively discussion do not come under free speech if they are “packed” with offending statements.

It also found the fine imposed on the woman was on the lower end of the available range of punishments and could not be considered disproportionate.

Ireland votes to remove blasphemy from the Constitution

There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death...
...Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.
Proverbs 14:12, 34

Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, Romans 1:22

This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.
For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers,...
II Timothy 3:1-2a

If the people haven't suffered enough, it's their God-given right to suffer more. William Aberhart

As reported by Patsy McGarry of the Irish Times, October 28, 2018 (bold in original):

Every single one of the 40 constituencies in Ireland voted to remove the word “blasphemous” from article 40.6.1 of the Constitution in a unanimity unique in recent Irish referendums.

Last Friday’s vote was closest in constituencies along the Wild Atlantic Way. In Donegal 51.5 per cent voted Yes to 48.4 per cent No, while those in Sligo-Leitrim voted 56.1 per cent to 43.9 per cent to change the Constitution.

Meanwhile, voters in Mayo voted by 56.9 per cent to 43.07 per cent; though the heavily urbanised Galway West constituency was an outlier where 65.8 per cent voted Yes and 34.1 per cent voted No.

Last May Donegal was the only constituency to reject removal of the Eighth Amendment from the Constitution in the abortion referendum, and in May 2015 Roscommon-South Leitrim was alone in voting No to same-sex marriage.

In Clare 61.8 per cent voted Yes and 38.1 per cent vote No, while in Kerry 57.6 voted Yes and 42.3 per cent vote No.

On the east coast, Yes tended to do better overall, with 72.7 per cent in Kildare North, for instance, the highest Yes vote outside Dublin.

In all the Dublin constituencies the Yes vote was over 70 per cent, with the highest in Dublin Bay South, where 76.4 per cent voted Yes. Next there was Dun Laoghaire, where 75.3 per cent voted Yes.

Altogether across the 40 constituencies, 64.85 per cent voted Yes, while 35.15 per cent voted No.

No room

Welcoming the result, Minister for Justice Charlie Flanagan said it had always been his view “that there is no room for a provision such as this in our Constitution”.

He said: “Ireland is rightly proud of our reputation as a modern, liberal society. The world has watched in recent years as we have taken landmark decisions as a people to change our Constitution with regard to some of the deepest personal matters when we voted Yes to marriage equality and to repealing the Eighth Amendment.”

He added: “We have again sent a message to the world, a strong message that laws against blasphemy do not reflect Irish values and that we do not believe such laws should exist.”

In a brief statement the Catholic bishops stressed, now that the offence of blasphemy had been removed from the Constitution, that “it is vital to ensure that the rights of individuals and communities to practise and live out their faith openly are protected by our law”.

The promotion of “freedom of religion, and the freedom of conscience – for all in society – greatly enriches the social fabric of a country, and is one aspect of respect for the dignity of human persons,” they said.

Bishop Kenneth Kearon, chairman of the Church of Ireland’s Church and Society Commission, welcomed the result but regretted “that we didn’t take the opportunity to take a lead within the international community by replacing it with a provision protecting freedom of thought, conscience and expression, including protection from hate speech; rights that are under threat or not available in many parts of the world”.

In a November 2013 joint statement, all the main churches in Ireland had described the blasphemy provision in the Constitution as “largely obsolete”.

Medieval crime

Atheist Ireland also welcomed what it described as removal of the “medieval crime of blasphemy” from the Constitution. Chairman Michael Nugent said it followed “a decade of campaigning by Atheist Ireland to have this referendum held”.

The two-to-one margin was “a great result for freedom of religion, belief, and speech, and for Irish politics based on integrity instead of nods and winks,” he said.

Welcoming the result, Amnesty International Ireland said it was “another important step towards a human-rights-compliant Constitution”.

“Now, States like Pakistan can no longer justify their own severe anti-blasphemy laws by pointing to Ireland’s Constitution,” said executive director Colm O’Gorman.

But he also called on the Government to “ensure that everyone can manifest and practise their religion without discrimination or threat. We also need to have robust prohibition of inciting hatred on religious and other grounds, in law and practice.”

The result was “another significant milestone for Ireland in becoming a modern, secular and more compassionate society,” said Noeleen Hartigan, chief executive of the Humanist Association of Ireland. “Our past should not prescribe our future, and the laws and practices which give one faith system dominance over people’s lives must be dismantled,” she said.
The errors and lies of those supporting the legalization of blasphemy are too numerous to list, but here are a few: Blasphemy is not an indication of social progress. A "modern liberal society" is not one to be proud of, and a "modern, secular" society is not "more compassionate" (the practices of abortion and euthanasia in such societies comes to mind). Blasphemy in Ireland is not the same as blasphemy in a Muslim country such as Pakistan.

The arguments used by those supporting the legalization of blasphemy provide evidence for blogger Vox Day's contention that "freedom of speech" has its origins in an Enlightenment reaction against the blasphemy laws that were in place in almost all Western countries. As someone whose ancestry, although not Roman Catholic, is largely Irish, it doesn't make this blogger glad to see this development. This is not going to end well.

Saturday, 27 October 2018

70 years ago: Pope Pius XII issues his encyclical In Multiplicibus Curis on Jerusalem

On October 23, 1948, Pope Pius issued his encyclical In Mulltiplicibus Curis, concerned with Jerusalem. At the time of this encyclical Israel had been a state for barely five months, and Jews and Arabs were fighting, with the occasional brief cease-fire, in what was then popularly known as Palestine.

The pontiff, in this encyclical, expressed a desire for peace in Palestine, but In Multiplicibus Curis mainly expressed concern for the protection of Jerusalem's holy sites and protection for those worshipping at them. The traditional Roman Catholic view of Jerusalem is that it belongs under the sovereignty of the Pope. The perceptive reader will notice that nowhere in this encyclical did Pope Pius XII acknowledge Israeli or Jewish sovereignty over Jerusalem; on the contrary, he called for international control over the city:

8. We are full of faith that these prayers and these hopes, an indication of the value that the Holy Places have for so great a part of the human family, will strengthen the conviction in the high quarters in which the problems of peace are discussed that it would be opportune to give Jerusalem and its outskirts, where are found so many and such precious memories of the life and death of the Savior, an international character which, in the present circumstances, seems to offer a better guarantee for the protection of the sanctuaries. It would also be necessary to assure, with international guarantees, both free access to Holy Places scattered throughout Palestine, and the freedom of worship and the respect of customs and religious traditions.

Friday, 26 October 2018

90 years ago: Dr. Robinson makes his second attempt to send a message to Mars

On October 26, 1928, Dr. Mansfield Robinson, former Vestry Clerk and Town Clerk of Shoreditch, England, reportedly received a reply to a telegraphic message he had sent from St. Albans, England to Oonaruru (or Oomararu), a big-eared woman from Mars, with whom he was allegedly in contact with by telepathy. The call was sent at 2:15 A.M. on October 23 and the engineers at St. Albans listened on a 30,000-metre wavelength, but--as reported by the 1929 World Almanac and Book of Facts--received no reply, Dr. Robinson said, until October 26, when word came that Mars is a wicked planet, not fit to associate with Earth.

As reported by Henry T. Russell of United Press and published in the Pittsburgh Press, October 24, 1928 (bold in original):

London, Oct. 24--Mars still remained 48,649,200 miles away from the rest of the world today, but to Dr. Hugh Mansfield Robinson it was as close as ever, which was no distance at all.

Apparent failure of his attempt to communicate with Mars by radio early today did not discourage the psychic student. Neither did the attitude of his wife, who sniffed at her husband's spiritual wanderings among the planets accompanied by a Martian girl friend with big ears; nor the frankly sceptical attitude of the world in general and men of science in particular.

Robinson, paying the regular government rate of 18 pence a word, sent two brief messages sputtering into space from the powerful Rugby wireless station aimed at the red planet.

"Mar la oi de earth," read one. Robinson, through his Martian girl guide, Oonoruru, was given the message by telepathy, he said, and he solemnly declared it meant "love to Mars from earth." It was sent at 2:19 a.m.

SECOND MESSAGE

At 2:30 a.m. a bored wireless operator sent the second message--"Com Ga Mar," meaning "God is Love."
The postoffice department, with due formality, tuned in from its St. Albans station on what is popularly supposed to be a good martian wave length and waited for a reply.

None was officially recorded there. But in Turnham Green, where Prof. A.M. Low, well-known British scientist, has his laboratory, four men waited expectantly by the fireside and two mysterious messages, in unknown code, were received.

Robinson jubilantly hoped they were from Mars, and despite a telepathic communication from Oonoruru that static prevented reception, he convinced himself today that the messages were from the neighboring planet.

Robinson, pursued by reporters and unable to reconcile his faith in the mysterious message received at Turnham Green with Conoruru's report of failure, parried inquiries today.

"I am certain we received messages, but they require decoding," he explained.

MAY TRY IN U.S.

Robinson told the press he planned to try to have a French or United States station transmit another message on a 30,000-meter length.

Meanwhile, indignant was caused among Robinson adherents by a letter in the Evening Standard from John C. Budden, a reader. Budden derided a message from Mars which Robinson claimed he had received recently through a medium. The message was "Oom ga wa na wa," which Robinson said was Martian for "God is all in all." Budden's letter said "Oom ga wa na wa" is a common saying among Tibetan Buddhist monks.

Mrs. Robinson, wife of the experimenter, today made it clear that "there will be no more of that foolishness in this house."

Shortly after Oonaruru, the six-foot Martian maiden with whom Robinson was attempting to communicate, sent him a telepathic message advising him to go to bed, Mrs. Robinson also handed out some advice.

"I don't know anything about this Mars affair," she told newspapermen. "I have refused to have the experiments conducted in this house while I remain in it. I don't know whether anyone encouraged my husband, but there will be no more of that foolishness in this house."

Oonaruru, the "girl with the big ears and the sweet face" who, according to Robinson, guided his ethereal body on its last trip of the radio messages which he sent out from the Rugby radio station had reached Mars.

Robinson said he received the following telepathic message from Oonaruru.

"Mars received neither message. Do not attempt to use the Rugby station again, but make the last attempt in America. Now go home to bed, but do not be downhearted. You have done enough for today."
This was not Dr. Robinson's first attempt to communicate with Mars; his first telegraphic message had been sent two years earlier, on October 27, 1926. As reported by Matt Brown in Londonist, April 2014:

Robinson first heard from the Martians in 1918, and his astral body supposedly visited Mars on several occasions. He describes a planet populated by men seven to eight feet tall, while the ladies were over six feet. "They have large ears sticking out on each side of the head, a huge shock of hair massed high, and a Chinese cast of features." These are described as 'intensely religious' beings, who treat atheism as a form of insanity. "They have great airships run by electricity. All their power is electrical, run from the harnessing of the canals and waterfalls in the mountains. They are consequently many generations in advance of us in wireless knowledge", the doctor elaborated. He also spoke of their society, believing that labour strikes were unknown, that the population was decentralised out of cities, and that their numbers included a lower caste of beings lacking in intelligence, and with heads shaped like that of a walrus.

The good doctor seemed taken with one Martian in particular, the lady Oomaruru. He claimed to be in regular telepathic contact with this girl from Mars. She is described as very fair, with a sweet face and big ears that "did not especially detract from her beauty". Oomaruru, whose name meant 'loved one', was a close friend of the director of Mars' biggest wireless station. With her help, Robinson hoped to convince the world of his interplanetary psychic wanderings...

...The puzzled telegraphist relayed the message to a transmitter at Rugby. From here, it was beamed into space on a wavelength of 18,240 metres. Receivers then listened out for a reply at 30,000 metres, a wavelength Dr Robinson believed the Martians to favour.

The post office had no precedent for such a long-distance message, but was very happy to take Robinson's custom. An official from the Central Radio Office commented: "If people wish to send messages even to the moon and the man theron, and are prepared to pay for them, there does not seem to be any valid reason why the post office should refuse revenue." Robinson was billed 18 pence per word for the radio transmission, equivalent to the long-distance ship rate.

Alas, his pennies were wasted. A day later, the Post Office confirmed that no signals had been received that could have emanated from the Red Planet. Robinson dismissed the negative result, claiming that other stations might yet receive something, and later saying (but never proving) that mysterious replies had been received. Few were convinced...

...Robinson never gave up his quest to speak to the Red Planet. In 1929 he tried again using an ordinary wireless set augmented with a 'psycho-telepathic motor-meter'. In 1930 he founded a college of telepathy whose staff included a telepathic dog called Nell. Then, in 1933, he claimed to have recorded the voice of Cleopatra, now a jilted farmer's wife living in a glass house on Mars.
Dr. Robinson died on December 23, 1940 at the age of 75. As far as this blogger is aware, various probes that have flown by or landed on Mars have found no evidence of the phenomena reported by Dr. Robinson--although the alleged Martians were right to regard atheism being a form of insanity.

For further reading: London's Edwardian SETI Programme And The Girl From Mars by Matt Brown, Londonist, April 2014

Opesti nipitia secomba: The story of one man’s quest to communicate with Mars by Jamie Harris, British Telecom, updated October 26, 2018

Thursday, 25 October 2018

Museum of the Bible removes five fragments thought to be from the Dead Sea Scrolls after they're proved to be forgeries

As reported by Harriet Alexander and Nick Allen of the London Daily Telegraph, October 22, 2018:

A Bible museum founded by an evangelical Christian billionaire has remove five fragments thought to have been from the Dead Sea Scrolls after experts concluded they were "inconsistent with ancient origin".

The $500 million Museum of the Bible was opened in November by Steve Green, the founder of craft chain Hobby Lobby, and displayed some of his artifacts built up over a decade of collecting.

But on Monday the chief curator, Jeffrey Kloha, announced that five of the 16 fragments in the museum's collection were being removed from public display after German-based scholars examined them.

Mr Kloha told CNN: "Though we had hoped the testing would render different results, this is an opportunity to educate the public on the importance of verifying the authenticity of rare biblical artifacts, the elaborate testing process undertaken, and our commitment to transparency."

He added: "As an educational institution entrusted with cultural heritage, the museum upholds and adheres to all museum and ethical guidelines on collection care, research and display."

It is not known how much was spent on the fragments but some academics had disputed their authenticity since they went on display.

Last year the museum sent the fragments to Germany's Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und-prüfung.

Experts there used 3D digital microscopy and studied the ink used on the papyrus.

Last year, the US Justice Department accused the Green family's company of smuggling ancient artifacts from Iraq.

Hobby Lobby agreed to pay a $3 million fine and return more than 5,000 items in a government settlement.

The Museum of the Bible issued a statement at the time stating that none of the artifacts involved were part of the Museum’s collection.
As reported by Yonat Shimron of Religion News Service, October 22, 2018:

Since its grand opening nearly a year ago, the Museum of the Bible has exhibited five fragments from the storied Dead Sea Scrolls, the ancient parchment fragments discovered 70 years ago in a desert cave.

On Monday, the museum acknowledged that the five fragments it had on display were forgeries. They were taken down several weeks ago and replaced with three other fragments that do not have the same anomalies.

The museum had long suspected the fragments may be forged and a sign accompanying the exhibit says scholars had raised questions about their authenticity. Last week the museum received scientific verification via digital and X-ray testing of the ink, sediment layers and chemical composition, which proved conclusively that the fragments were forged.

“This is part of our ongoing commitment to making sure we’re adhering to all legal and museum standards, that our displays are accurate, that when we have information, we make it available,” said Jeff Kloha, chief curatorial officer. “Where we had uncertainty about the documentation, we put that up on the museum website and updated labels on the displays.”

This is not the first time the museum has faced questions about the problematic origins of some of its antiquities. Many of the items in the Washington, D.C., museum were purchased beginning in 2009 by the billionaire Oklahoma-based Green family, owners of the Hobby Lobby craft store chain.

The museum has benefited from the Greens’ buying spree. The family amassed about 40,000 items, some of which were donated to the museum, including the purported Dead Sea Scroll fragments.

But last year, Hobby Lobby agreed to return nearly 4,000 artifacts to Iraq after they were found to have been looted from Iraqi archaeological sites. As part of the settlement with the Justice Department, the company was also required to pay $3 million to the U.S. government.

The Dead Sea Scrolls are considered among the 20th century’s greatest archaeological finds. They were discovered by Bedouin shepherds in 1947 in caves near the Dead Sea and are about 1,100 years older than any other existing texts of the Hebrew Bible. Among the fragments are portions of the Ten Commandments and the Book of Genesis.

They would be a prized item for any serious collector, and especially the evangelical Green family. But the Israel Antiquities Authority owns most of them and displays them in Jerusalem’s Shrine of the Book. Many can now be viewed online, too.

“For the Greens and many collectors like them from the evangelical community, there’s something about the tangibility of the text, something about being able to touch a part of the Bible that predates Jesus,” said Joel Baden, a professor of Hebrew Bible at Yale Divinity School. “There’s some deeply seated appeal in ‘the oldest’ and these are absolutely the oldest texts we have.”

The Green family bought 16 scroll fragments between 2009 and 2014, Kloha said. Twelve of the 16 were purchased in 2009 and 2010. He did not say how much Hobby Lobby paid for the items before they were donated to the museum.

Lawrence Schiffman, an adviser to the Museum of the Bible, disputed a commonly held narrative that the Greens erred by buying too many artifacts too quickly, without guidance from professionals who could properly vet their origin and authenticity.

He noted that since 2002, close to 70 items that have come on the market as Dead Sea Scroll fragments appear to be suspect. Some fragments were sold to Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary in Fort Worth, Texas, others to Azusa Pacific University in Azusa, Calif.

“This is not the only institution with post-2002 fragments,” said Schiffman, professor of Hebrew and Judaic studies at New York University. “They were purchased by a whole bunch of people and they were purchased with very good pedigree. These buyers were all filched by sophisticated people.”

Kloha said the scroll fragments underwent three rounds of investigation to verify their provenance, handwriting style and the chemical relationship between the parchment and ink. The results of the third round, considered the best determinant of authenticity, came in last week.
March 14, 2020 update: As reported by Marc Brodsky of Jewish Telegraphic Agency, March 13, 2020 (link in original):

The 16 Dead Seas Scroll fragments housed at the Museum of the Bible in Washington, D.C., are forgeries, museum officials said Friday.

“We’re victims — we’re victims of misrepresentation, we’re victims of fraud,” CEO Harry Hargrove said at an academic conference hosted by the museum, National Geographic reported.

A team of researchers led by an art fraud investigator issued a 200-page report saying that while the fragments may be made of ancient leather, the ink was from modern times and altered to look like the real Dead Sea Scrolls.

Most of the 100,000 real Dead Sea Scroll fragments lie in the Israel Museum in Jerusalem, and the report does not question their authenticity. Bedouins found clay jars in the West Bank’s Qumran caves in 1947 holding thousands of the parchment scrolls dating back more than 1,800 years, including some of the oldest surviving copies of the Hebrew Bible.

Wednesday, 24 October 2018

Christian Heritage Party wins lawsuit against city of Hamilton over "offensive" bus shelter ads

A legal victory for Christians in Trudeaupia Canada is quite a rarity these days; this one may prove to be temporary, but it's the first win in recent memory. As reported by Samantha Craggs of CBC News, October 5, 2018 (link in original):

The Christian Heritage Party (CHP) has won a lawsuit against the City of Hamilton after the city removed bus shelter ads it deemed transphobic.

A panel of three superior court judges say the CHP has a right to engage in political speech, even if some find that speech offensive. The decision doesn't award specific costs, but it strikes down a city decision to remove the bus shelter ads.

The party took the city to divisional court after it placed three HSR bus shelter ads in 2016.
(photo)

The ads coincided with the city's intent to pass a new transgender and gender non-conforming protocol. The ads depicted someone who appeared to be male entering a door marked "Ladies Showers."

"Competing human rights," it read. "Where is the justice?"

The CHP also distributed 3,500 flyers to Hamilton Mountain homes. The flyers encouraged residents to contact city councillors about keeping transgender women in particular out of women's washrooms.

The city pulled the bus shelter ads and apologized for their "offensive nature." ​It also told Outfront Media, the third-party company that handles HSR ads, to be more careful about ad content.

The party and its Hamilton Mountain electoral district association then sued the city.

The Oct. 4 decision from divisional court judges Ruth Mesbur, Michael Varpio and Frederick Myers says the city violated the party's charter rights to "engage in political discussion."

"A political party's ability to advertise on bus shelters is an important phenomenon for the political process and for society as a whole," it reads.

"Speech is not 'violence' just because people may find it offensive."

The decision also says the city lacked a formal process for yanking the ads. City staff removed the ads to protect its image, the decision reads, without weighing the CHP's charter right to political expression.

The decision encourages the two parties to work out costs themselves. If they can't, both sides will give the court a list of their legal costs.

It's not clear if this means the ads will be back in bus shelters again. The city is considering an appeal.

City lawyers are "reviewing the decision and all options available," said spokesperson Jen Recine.

Coun. Aidan Johnson of Ward 1 said the city has "a moral obligation" to appeal.

"For me, the fundamental issue is whether or not the city has an obligation to ensure that city spaces are equally dignified and equally welcoming for all people."

Albertos Polizogopoulos represented the CHP.

"The court has simply affirmed the importance of freedom of expression and more particularly, the important role freedom of political expression plays in our society," he said. "Needless to say, we're happy with the result.

City council nearly voted in June to settle with the party, but ultimately voted 10-3 to continue in court.
It comes as no surprise to this blogger,or anybody else, that the city is beginning the process of appealing the ruling; I pray the appeal fails. As reported by CBC News, October 16, 2018:

Hamilton is starting the process to appeal a superior court decision that determined the Christian Heritage Party (CHP) had the right to post bus shelter ads the city deemed transphobic.

The city's legal services staff will file a notice of motion for leave to appeal the court's decision, according to spokesperson Jen Recine.

A panel of three superior court judges ruled last week that the CHP has a right to engage in political speech, even if some find that speech offensive. The decision didn't award specific costs, but it struck down the city's decision to remove the ads.

The party took the city to divisional court after it placed three HSR bus shelter ads in 2016 that depicted someone who appeared to be male entering a door marked "Ladies Showers."

"Competing human rights," it read. "Where is the justice?"

The city stripped the bus shelter ads and apologized for their "offensive nature."

t also cautioned Outfront Media, the third-party company that handles HSR ads, to be more careful about ad content.

The CHP and its Hamilton Mountain electoral district association then sued the city.

Recine described the city taking steps to appeal the decision as an "effort to preserve the city's rights."

Council intended to discuss the court decision during an emergency city hall meeting Tuesday morning. Recine said that meeting did not take place, but staff put out a media release about the appeal process to keep the public updated.

"Staff will take the necessary actions related to the carrying out of the appeal process in the interim until further direction from Council is provided in December," according to the release.

Tuesday, 23 October 2018

Spanish Parliament takes first steps toward legalization of euthanasia

I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live: Deuteronomy 30:19

For whoso findeth me findeth life, and shall obtain favour of the Lord.
But he that sinneth against me wrongeth his own soul: all they that hate me love death.
Proverbs 8:35-36

There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death. Proverbs 14:12 (also Proverbs 16:25)

Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people. Proverbs 14:34

Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,...
...And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
Romans 1:22,28

I missed this when it was first reported; as reported by Agence France-Presse, June 27, 2018:

Spain's lower house voted Tuesday in favour of examining a draft law on legalising euthanasia, the second such bill accepted for consideration in just over a month in a first for the country.

Lawmakers voted 208 against 133 -- and one abstention -- to examine the bill, which was drafted by the ruling Socialist party.

In May, a similar proposal submitted by Catalonia's regional parliament was also admitted, but it only focused on legalising euthanasia.

This latest draft law also seeks to make euthanasia legal in public and private health services.

But it goes a step further by regulating it, laying out the conditions by which a person can apply to die.

It is the first time that bills aimed at legalising euthanasia make it past this first parliamentary hurdle after previous attempts failed.

"This regulation guarantees to protect the fundamental right to life, but also the recognition that it isn't an absolute right," Adriana Lastra, deputy head of the Socialist party, told parliament.

"It's a right that must be adjusted according to other values, including that of human dignity."

The draft law stipulates that a person can apply to die if he or she has a serious and terminal illness or suffers from a chronic, severe disability, and if they are Spanish or a legal resident in Spain.

The patient has to make his or her request by writing, free of any pressure, and repeat that demand after 15 days.

A person who can no longer take decisions but has previously given official instructions for the right to die will also be eligible.

Their doctor will then determine whether the patient meets these conditions and ask another physician who knows about the illness or disability to check this too.

Once these checks are done, the doctor will take the case to a regional evaluation and control commission which will give its final say.

For now, people with incurable diseases in Spain only have the option to refuse treatment.

In Europe, Euthanasia is legal in the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg.

Other countries such as Switzerland allow assisted suicide, a practice that lets a doctor provide a patient with all the necessary lethal substances to end their life and leave them to carry out the final act.

Now that it has passed the first hurdle, the bill will go through various stages in parliament before it gets to the final voting stage in the lower house.
The earlier vote was reported by Agence France-Presse, May 10, 2018:

Spain's lower house voted Thursday in favour of examining a bill on legalising euthanasia, a first in the country even if there will likely be major opposition as it weaves its way through parliament.

Lawmakers voted 173 against 135 -- and 32 abstentions -- to examine the bill, which was originally drafted by Catalonia's regional assembly.

This is the first time that a bill aimed at legalising euthanasia makes it past this first hurdle after previous attempts failed, a parliament spokeswoman told AFP.

It seeks to modify part of article 143 of Spain's penal code, which currently bans anyone from causing or cooperating with the death of another person suffering from "a serious, terminal illness or one that causes serious, permanent ailments that are difficult to endure."

The bill would make it legal for a person to cause or help cause the "reliable, peaceful, painless death" of another suffering from those problems if they "specifically, freely and unequivocally" ask for it.

Currently in Spain, people with incurable diseases only have the option to refuse treatment.

But according to an opinion poll conducted by research firm Metroscopia in March 2017, 84 percent of Spaniards are in favour of allowing people with terminal illnesses to be helped to die "painlessly."

Lawmakers from Spain's conservative ruling Popular Party and another from the regional party of Navarra voted against accepting the bill on Thursday.

Centre-right party Ciudadanos, meanwhile, abstained, while all the other groupings in parliament -- most of them left-wing -- voted in favour.

Now that it has passed the first hurdle, the bill will go through various stages in parliament -- with different groups likely to present their amendments -- before it gets to the final voting stage in the lower house.

Monday, 22 October 2018

Second French Roman Catholic priest within a month commits suicide in church after accusations of sexual assault

This seems to be turning into a monthly tradition; oddly, the accusations were of heterosexual assaults. As reported by Agence France-Presse, October 22, 2018:

A priest in central France accused of sexually assaulting a minor committed suicide in his church, Catholic authorities said Monday, the second French priest to take his life over abuse claims in a month.

Pierre-Yves Fumery, 38, hanged himself in his presbytery in the town of Gien in the Loire valley. His body was found on Saturday.

The public prosecutor for the area, Loic Abrial, told AFP he had been questioned last week by police about allegations of sexual assault involving a child under the age of 15.

Fumery had not been formally charged but was under investigation because of reports from the community about his behaviour, prosecutors said.

Orleans bishop Jacques Blaquart, whose diocese includes Gien, called it a "moment of suffering and a tragic ordeal".

Blaquart said some members of Fumery's parish had brought attention to the priest's "inappropriate behaviour" towards children aged 13, 14 and 15, including a girl "that he took in his arms and drove home several times."

The bishop said the nature of the claims did not require the diocese to report the priest to the authorities and that he had told Fumery to "take a step back", seek counselling and leave town for a little while.

The priest took his advice and returned to Gien after a short break but had not yet resumed his duties, Blaquart said.

He is the second priest in over a month to commit suicide in similar circumstances.

On September 19, Jean-Baptiste Sebe, also aged 38, hanged himself in his church in the northern city of Rouen after a woman accused him of sexually assaulting her adult daughter.

No formal complaint had been made at the time of his death.

The Catholic Church has been shaken by a string of paedophile scandals over the past 25 years.

The most senior French Catholic cleric to be caught up in scandal is Cardinal Philippe Barbarin, who is to go on trial in January for allegedly covering up for a priest accused of abusing boy scouts in the Lyon area in the 1980s.
The earlier incident was reported by Agence France-Presse on September 20, 2018:

A 38-year-old French priest in a northern French town committed suicide in his church after being accused of molesting a young woman, local prosecutors and police sources told AFP on Wednesday.

Jean-Baptiste Sebe killed himself Tuesday in the church north of Rouen amid allegations from a local mother that her grown-up daughter had been a victim of "indecent behaviour and sexual assault," a police source said.

The initial complaint was made to the archbishop of Rouen, and "police were not notified prior to the suicide," the source added, stressing that investigators remained "very cautious at this stage."

Local prosecutor Etienne Thieffry confirmed that an investigation was underway into "the exact reasons for the suicide" at the Saint-Jean XXIII church.

"At this point, no complaint has been filed," Thieffry said.

A spokesman for the Rouen diocese, Eric de la Bourdonnaye, told AFP he could "neither confirm nor deny these reports..."

Buddhist and Roman Catholic nuns hold their first inter-religious meeting in Taiwan

It comes as no surprise to this blogger that the link that unites Buddhist and Roman Catholic nuns is the practice of contemplative spirituality. Those who claim to be Christians and who practice contemplative spirituality--Eastern meditation disguised as Christian--head first in the direction of Roman Catholicism and then in the direction of universalism. They start to read and follow the practices of "Christians" such as the Desert Fathers, which leads them toward Roman Catholicism. They then discover that followers of other religions have the same spiritual experiences, which leads to the natural conclusion that the experiences come from the same source for the non-Christian as for the Christian. Lighthouse Trails Research Project is the best source I know for information on contmplative spirituality.

As reported by La Stampa, October 17, 2018:

“Contemplative Action and Active Contemplation: Buddhist and Christian Nuns in Dialogue” this is the theme of the first joint international conference between the consecrated women of the two religions which is taking place in Kaohsiung, Taiwan from 13 to 20 October. As a note from the Vatican Press Office informs us, this is a joint initiative of the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue, the Association of the Major Superiors of Taiwan and the Fo Guang Shan Buddhist Monastery, site of the work and place where the first formal Buddhist-Christian conversation took place in 1995.

Seventy Buddhist and Catholic nuns, mainly from Taiwan, but also from other countries such as South Korea, Japan, India, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Thailand, Singapore, Hong Kong, Cambodia, the Philippines, Brazil, Italy, Germany, Norway and the United States, took part in the international dialogue.

Representing the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue are Bishop Miguel Ángel Ayuso Guixot, Secretary of the Department, and Monsignor Indunil Janakaratne Kodithuwakku Kankanamalage, Undersecretary with responsibility for Buddhism. Father William Skudlarek Osb, Secretary General of the Monastic Interreligious Dialogue (MID) and also consultant to the Pontifical Council, will lead a delegation of fourteen Catholic women from Asia and Europe and the Americas. A European delegation from the World Council of Churches in Geneva, led by Lutheran Simone Sinn, was also present.

The agenda of the First International Buddhist-Christian Dialogue for Nuns - explains the Vatican note - includes the following items: The Origin, Evolution and Present-day Situation of Monastic Religious Life for Women in Buddhism and Christianity; Buddhist and Christian Approaches to Active Contemplation and Contemplative Action (Right Mindfulness and Right Conduct); Buddhist Meditation and Christian Contemplation; The Service of Buddhist and Christian Nuns to Humanity; Religious Women Promoting the ‘Feminine Genius’; Sharing Stories of Buddhist-Christian Solidarity and Envisioning Future Possibilities.

The international dialogue seeks to achieve two main objectives: to promote the dialogue of spiritual or religious experiences and to create more space for women to participate in interreligious dialogue. The work of these days is marked not only by discussions in plenary sessions, but also by visits to sacred places in the region, individual conversations and small groups, testimonies of stories of solidarity.

In his speech, delivered on Sunday 14 October - and reported by L’Osservatore Romano - Bishop Ayuso stressed in particular the need to create more space for women to participate in inter-religious dialogue, strengthened by the encouragement of Pope Francis who - the prelate recalled - on more than one occasion stressed that many women are well prepared to face dialogue meetings at the highest levels and not only from the Catholic side. For this reason, he added, their presence today is more necessary than ever.

Sunday, 21 October 2018

Percentage of female clergy in liberal denominations has increased greatly in the last 20 years

As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths. Isaiah 3:12

This is a true saying, if a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work.
A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife,...
I Timothy 3:1-2a

For this cause left I thee in Crete, that thou shouldest set in order the things that are wanting, and ordain elders in every city, as I had appointed thee:
If any be blameless, the husband of one wife, having faithful children not accused of riot or unruly.
Titus 1:5-6

It comes as no surprise to this blogger to see that the most liberal religious denominations, such as those mentioned in the following article, are the ones where the percentage of women in positions of leadership has been increasing in recent years. The Unitarian-Universalists, of course, aren't Christian in any way (although, with the direction in which evangelicalism is heading, I wouldn't be surprised to see a movement for "Christians and Unitarian-Universalists Together"). The United Church of Christ is as apostate a denomination as you'll find that still claims to be Christian. As reported by Adelle M. Banks of Religious News Service, October 18, 2018:

The share of women in the ranks of American clergy has doubled — and sometimes tripled — in some denominations during the past two decades, a new report shows.

“I was really surprised, in a way, at how much progress there’s been in 20 years,” said the report’s author, Eileen Campbell-Reed, an associate professor at Central Baptist Theological Seminary in Nashville, Tenn. “There’s kind of a circulating idea that, oh well, women in ministry has kind of plateaued and there really hasn’t been lot of growth. And that’s just not true.”

The two traditions with the highest percentages of women clergy were the Unitarian Universalist Association and the United Church of Christ, according to the “State of Clergywomen in the U.S.,” released earlier this month. Fifty-seven percent of UUA clergy were women in 2017, while half of clergy in the UCC were female in 2015. In 1994, women constituted 30 percent of UUA clergy and 25 percent of UCC clergy.

UUA President Susan Frederick-Gray credits the increase to a decision by her denomination’s General Assembly in 1970 to call for more women to serve in ministry and policymaking roles. She noted that as of this year, 60 percent of UUA clergy are women.

“All that work in the ’70s and ’80s made it possible for me, in the early 2000s, to come into ministry and be successful and lead thriving churches,” said Frederick-Gray, “and now be elected as the first female, first woman minister elected to the UUA presidency.”

Campbell-Reed and a research assistant gathered clergywomen statistics that had not been collected across 15 denominations for two decades.

The Rev. Barbara Brown Zikmund, who co-wrote the 1998 book “Clergy Women: An Uphill Calling,” welcomed the new report as a way to start closing the gap in the research.

“While the experiences of women and the evolution of church life and leadership have changed dramatically over the past two decades,” she said, “there have been no comprehensive studies on women and church leadership.”

Reached between recent convocation events at Andover Newton Seminary, the Rev. Davida Foy Crabtree, a retired UCC minister, said the report’s findings were reflected around her.

“I was sort of looking around and seeing so many women and remembering that in my years in seminary in the ’60s how few of us there were,” said Crabtree, a trustee and alumna of the theological school. “So it’s definitely a sea change in terms of women’s ordination.”

Campbell-Reed’s research found a tripling of percentages of clergywomen in the Assemblies of God, the Episcopal Church and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America between 1994 and 2017.

But Campbell-Reed also found that clergywomen — with the exception of Unitarian Universalists — continue to lag behind clergymen in leading their churches. In the UCC, for example, female and male clergy are equal in number, but 38 percent of UCC pastors are women.

Instead, many clergywomen — as well as clergymen — serve in ministerial roles other than that of pastor, including chaplains, nonprofit staffers and professors.

Paula Nesbitt, president of the Association for the Sociology of Religion, said other researchers have long observed “the persistent clergy gender gap in attainment and compensation.”

For women of color, especially, significant gaps remain, and for women in some conservative churches, ordination is not an option.

Campbell-Reed noted that clergywomen of color “remain a distinct minority” in most mainline denominations. Those who have risen to leadership in the top echelons of their religious groups, she said, have done so after long years of service.

“Some of them are also being recognized for their contributions and their work, like any other person who’s got longevity and wisdom, by being elected as bishops in their various communions,” she said of denominations such as the United Methodist Church and the ELCA.

Campbell-Reed also pointed out the role of women who serve churches despite being barred from pastoral positions in congregations of the country’s two largest denominations, the Southern Baptist Convention and the Roman Catholic Church.

Former Southern Baptist women like herself have joined the pastoral staffs of breakaway groups such as the Alliance of Baptists, which have women pastoring 40 percent of their congregations. And Catholic women constitute 80 percent of lay ecclesial ministers, who “are running the church on a day-to-day basis,” she said.

Patricia Mei Yin Chang, another co-author of “Clergy Women: An Uphill Calling,” said the new statistics prompt questions about the meaning behind them, such as changing attitudes of congregations or decreases in male clergy.

“Those are two really different causes,” she said, “and they may differ across denominations.”

Campbell-Reed, whose 20-page report concludes with two pages of questions for seminaries, churches, researchers and theologians, said the answers about the often-difficult job hunt for clergywomen relate to sexism.

“Just because more women enter into jobs in the church or are ordained does not mean that the problems of sexism have gone away,” she said. “At times, the bias is more implicit but no less real.”

Some women are reaching “tall-steeple” pulpits — leadership in prominent churches — instead of being relegated to struggling congregations, often in denominations on the decline.

Frederick-Gray said her denomination, which is working on race equality as well as gender equality, is seeing greater opportunities for women to preach in its largest churches. Of the 41 largest congregations in the Unitarian Universalist Association, 20 are served by women senior ministers.

Women’s leadership, Frederick-Gray said, is necessary at a time of decline for many religions.

“The decline is not the responsibility of women,” she said. “But maybe we will be the hope for the future.”
As usual, the clergyhag with the stereotypical hyphenated name has it wrong with those last comments. Putting women in positions of leadership is, and always has been, both a symptom and a significant contributing factor in declining membership and increasing apostasy. For a church to put women in positions of leadership is an indication of the liberalism that already exists within that body; and it invariably proves to be an indication of further apostasy and declining membership to come in whatever denomination adopts the unbiblical practice.

Saturday, 20 October 2018

90 years ago: Atheist goes on hunger strike to protest Arkansas Constitution

The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. Psalms 14:1a (also Psalms 53:1a)

On October 20, 1928, Charles Smith of New York, President of the American Association for the Advancement of Atheism, went on a hunger strike in the Little Rock, Arkansas City Jail, protesting the "injustice of refusing an American the right to testify in his own behalf." He went there to campaign against a proposed anti-evolution amendment, and refused to pay when fined for allegedly distributing circulars which proclaimed "The Bible is a lie" and "God is a ghost." Then, as now, Article 19:1 of the Arkansas Constitution reads: "No person who denies the being of a God shall hold any office in the civil departments of this State, nor be competent to testify as a witness in any court." Mr. Smith ended his hunger strike on November 1 after his fine was paid by an admirer.

It did come as a surprise to this blogger that Article 19:1 is still part of the Arkansas Constitution, but it comes as no surprise that it hasn't been enforced in recent memory, since Article VI.3 of the Constitution of the United States prohibits religious tests for holding office, and the First Amendment provides for freedom of religion.

Blogger Vox Day has been arguing recently that Western nations should bring back the laws against blasphemy that they once had; given the behaviour of the anti-Christian individuals and movements and the resulting damage to what was once regarded as civilization, I'm increasingly sympathetic to his position.

Friday, 19 October 2018

Use of abortion pill slowly increases in Canada

I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live: Deuteronomy 30:19

For whoso findeth me findeth life, and shall obtain favour of the Lord.
But he that sinneth against me wrongeth his own soul: all they that hate me love death.
Proverbs 8:35-36

There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death. Proverbs 14:12 (also Proverbs 16:25)

Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people. Proverbs 14:34

Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Isaiah 5:20

The following article illustrates abortion advocates' idea of "choice": you can choose to have your child killed by surgery or by a pill. It's easy to forget that the abortion pill was legalized in Canada not by the rabidly anti-Christian Liberal government of Justin Trudeau, but by the "Conservative" government of alleged Christian Stephen Harper; and it wasn't legalized by passage of a law, but by a bureaucratic decision. As reported by Tyler Dawson in the National Post, October 15, 2018:

EDMONTON — It was Calgary’s Kensington clinic that prescribed the first dose of Mifegymiso, the two-pill abortion drug, after it became available in Canada in January 2017.

“When it arrived on our doorstep, we had a patient that day and we offered it to her; we were ready to go,” said clinic executive director Celia Posyniak.

Since Alberta began covering the cost of Mifegymiso last July, at least 2,792 doses have been prescribed — the overwhelming majority of them in Calgary — while 7,197 surgical abortions were performed in the same period. Since the drug became available in January 2017, at least 13,000 prescriptions have been written or filled across Canada, according to numbers provided to the National Post by provincial health ministries.

While the data is incomplete — Yukon wouldn’t release its numbers for privacy reasons and Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island didn’t respond to the Post’s inquiries — it gives some insight into the rollout of the abortion pill in Canada. Long available in other countries, its arrival here was heralded as major progress for women’s health and a step towards addressing abortion shortages outside of urban centres.

But, as with the delivery of surgical abortion services, there are discrepancies between provinces, in terms of public funding for the drug. Newfoundland and Labrador just started offering Mifegymiso last month. Yukon is in the “final stages” of developing its coverage. Other provinces have complex setups, including Manitoba, where Mifegymiso is covered if dispensed by an abortion clinic, but goes through the provincial pharmacare plan if received elsewhere.

What the numbers suggest is that Mifegymiso hasn’t solved issues of access to abortion in rural and remote areas — at least not yet. In Alberta, for example, just 39 claims were made outside of Edmonton and Calgary between July 21, 2017 and June 28, 2018. This could be because rural doctors don’t want to be involved in abortion services, Posyniak said. It’s also possible that women living in rural areas would rather get an abortion in a large city.

“Some women may prefer to travel to larger centres to maintain confidentiality or to receive specialized care,” Rob Gereghty, assistant director of communications for Alberta Health, said in an email.

But, experts say, substantial progress has been made despite some unavoidable hiccups during the rollout of the drug. “Were still on the very early parts of the curve,” said Dr. Wendy Norman, a University of British Columbia professor who researches reproductive services.

The numbers give insight not only into the prevalence of the prescription as a method of abortion in Canada, but also the challenges that have faced clinics, doctors and patients since Health Canada approved it in 2015. The first doses didn’t arrive in Canada until 2017 — and there were supply issues throughout the year, Posyniak said. Even after the drug became available, it took awhile for provinces to start offering public coverage, and it’s still uneven across Canada. The pills can cost between $300 and $450, so, experts said, public coverage was essential to its appeal.

After Mifegymiso became legal, dispensing policies, educational programs, such as online courses, for physicians and pharmacists all took time, explaining the lag between approval, availability and access. Some clinics, such as the Kensington Clinic, were able to get up and running faster because they were already major providers of surgical abortions, with the experience necessary to quickly develop medical abortion practises.

“The change you see in different provinces’ uptake is very much reflective of the fact that it typically takes … between six months and nine months, even for a purpose-specific abortion facility, to agree on protocols and get the infrastructure in place,” Norman said.

In Quebec, that process led to major delays. For example, the college of physicians in Quebec initially wanted doctors prescribing the pill to also know how to perform surgical abortions, limiting the pool of potential prescribers.

By this May, that was abandoned, said Université Laval faculty of medicine professor Édith Guilbert in an email. Instead, there’s a three-day, in-person course at an abortion clinic for “all physicians who wanted to prescribe the abortion pill and had not been trained in family planning or whose training has not been put into practice for the past three years,” Guilbert wrote. “Quebec is the only province in Canada requiring such a training which may be difficult to take for most primary care physicians, obstetrician-gynecologists or nurse practitioners.”

Since the province began covering the cost last December, only 104 prescriptions were filled as of Aug. 6. The province had about 17,000 surgical abortions in that same time period.

Elsewhere in Canada, though, Mifegymiso is making significant inroads, especially after Health Canada relaxed rules around prescribing last fall.

“We are seeing in Canada a strong preference among those presenting for abortion, to choose a medical abortion if it is available,” Norman said. “Reports from centres offering both choices estimate that between half and three quarters of those eligible, will choose medical over surgical abortion.”

The available numbers offer evidence in support of this: New Brunswick, the first province to cover the cost of Mifegymiso, paid for 407 Mifegymiso prescriptions between June 28, 2017 and June 28, 2018, and, in that same time period, there were 654 surgical abortions. Manitoba didn’t have precise data, but estimated that about 15 per cent of its abortions will be done medically.

Frédérique Chabot, director of health promotion for Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights, said British Columbia has been particularly supportive of medical abortion services. In the province, about one-third of all abortions are now medical. In Calgary, Posyniak said she expects around 40 per cent of the Kensington Clinic’s clients will eventually choose the pill, now that they’re offered the option, but that the number of annual abortions — surgical or medical — “hasn’t changed at all.”

The available data may be incomplete, but it is a “very interesting pieces of this puzzle,” Chabot said.

“We’re just at the beginning and (the numbers are) demonstrating that there is actually, there was a demand, there was a need,” Chabot said. “It’s actually changing the landscape in terms of what access to a complete package of reproductive health services can look like.”
See also my post Canada's "Conservative" government legalizes RU-486 abortion pill (July 31, 2015)

Thursday, 18 October 2018

Bronze Age Israeli artifacts to be exhibited in China for the first time

Bowl decorated with recumbent lions and calves before the symbol of the god An. (Photo credit: David Harris/BLMJ)

As reported by David Brummer of Breaking Israeli News, October 18, 2018:

A new international exhibition entitled “Bronze Age Mesopotamia and the Chengdu Plain,” will open October 21 in China – representing the first time that Israeli historical artifacts will be displayed in the Asian superpower. Hosted at the Sichuan University Museum the exhibition focuses on the two ancient civilizations that developed at the opposite extremities of Asia: Mesopotamia in the Middle East and the East Asian Chengdu Valley.

Scholars define the Bronze Age as taking place between 3,300 BCE to 1,200 BCE.

The Bible Lands Museum in Jerusalem – the only one of its kind dedicated to the history of the Ancient Near East from a biblical perspective – will loan 15 artifacts to the exhibit. Through these objects – cuneiform tablets, cylinder seals, and a statuette made of precious blue lapis lazuli – visitors will discover the way of life, the royal institutions and the rituals that characterized the ancient Mesopotamian civilization. In addition, the exhibition will include dozens of artifacts on loan from various museums in China and from the Yale Peabody Museum in the United States.

The exhibit has been constructed in such a way to offer visitors a comparative view of two Bronze Age civilizations – separated by 5,500 kilometers (3,400 miles) – and in regions that witnessed the development of rich cultures.

“The goal of the Museum is to connect each individual with their own educational heritage through the treasures on display. Welcoming visitors of all faiths and nationalities, it brings the universal narrative of the development of civilization to audiences through exhibitions, and cultural programs ,” said Director of Bible Lands Museum Amanda Weiss.

“This exhibition provides a wonderful opportunity to extend the limits of our knowledge, to create a dialog between different cultures, to observe the traits they had in common in the past, and to forge fruitful in the present.,” she added.

The exhibition marks the first collaboration of its kind between Israel and China – and is symptomatic of a deepening of ties between the two countries – culturally and economically. Despite a slight decline in Chinese tourism to Israel in 2018 – following a government directive that it was not safe to travel there – numbers are beginning to pick up again. In the first eight months of the year, Israel welcomed a total of 65,500 tourists from China, which was still more than in all of 2015, but down 8 percent from the same period in 2017.

Wednesday, 17 October 2018

Recent articles from the Daily Telegraph document Britain's--and Western society's--increasing insanity

Woe unto them that draw iniquity with cords of vanity, and sin as it were with a cart rope:..
...Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!
Isaiah 5:18, 20-21

This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come...
...But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.
II Timothy 3:1, 13

Here, surely, is the world's record in the domain of the ridiculous and the contemptible... Sir Winston Churchill

Western society is getting more insane every day, fulfilling the prophecy above. The London Daily Telegraph has provided ample documentation of the increasing decadence in recent articles such as the following (links in original).

As reported by Camilla Turner, October 4, 2018:

Parents who refuse to let their son wear a skirt to school may need to be referred to social services, a council’s guidance has advised schools.

Mothers and fathers who dismiss a “gender questioning” child’s requests to change their name could also be a trigger for concern, according to Brighton and Hove City Council’s “Trans Inclusion Schools Toolkit”.

It comes after warnings that schools are "sowing confusion" in children's minds by over-promoting transgender issues, and that children are being encouraged to “unlearn” the difference between boys and girls.

The guidance advises teachers on how to handle a number of different scenarios, including if parents say: “I refuse to allow my son to change his name or wear skirts”.

Schools are advised that some parents may “struggle” to accept their child’s gender identity and it may be a long time before they accept the change.

“If a setting has a significant concern about the child’s wellbeing and or safety in relation to how the parents or carers are managing the exploration of the child’s gender identity it may be necessary and advisable to follow safeguarding procedures,” schools are told.

The Department for Education (DfE)’s statutory guidance on safeguarding says that staff with concerns about a child must alert the school’s safeguarding lead, and if necessary contact social services or the police...

...The guidance document, now in its third edition, was produced by Allsorts Youth Project, a charity that supports young people who identify as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender or Queer (LGBTQ).

It advises that in “all cases”, transgender pupils should be allowed to use the changing room that corresponds to their gender identity, rather than their biological sex.

This means that any boy who identifies as a female should be allowed to use girls’ changing rooms, even if it makes other girls feel “uncomfortable”.

“It is important to ensure that these are safe environments for all by challenging underlying attitudes and bullying behaviours,” the guidance says...

...Earlier this year, it emerged that a teacher who was accused of “misgendering” a child was told by police that she had committed a hate crime.

The teacher, who claimed they were a “grammatical purist”, refused to acknowledge that the pupil self-identified as a boy and failed to use the pupil’s preferred pronouns of “he” or “him”.
As reported by Ms. Turner, October 11, 2018:

A student union is seeking to ban students from dressing up as Tories at fancy dress parties to avoid causing offence.

Kent University’s student union has drafted a new set of “Fancy Dress Guidelines” which say that groups are allowed to host fancy dress parties so long as costumes are not “offensive, discriminatory and prejudice to an individual’s race, gender, disability or sexual orientation or based on stereotypes”.

This is to ensure that the university is a “safe space" for undergraduates, where no one is embarrassed or upset by seeing a fellow student's costume, according to the Canterbury Journal.

Dressing up as “Tories” and “chavs” are given as examples of costumes to avoid, as these would breach the “class and political stereotypes” section of the guidance.

“Fancy Dress themes should also not be centred around political group stereotypes or the stereotypes of different levels of perceived class in the means to diminish their worth or validity,” the guidance says.

“This again would promote an unsafe and exclusive campus to which we do not tolerate.” Among the dozens of outfits it deems "offensive" are cowboys, Native Americans, priests and nuns, and anyone who wears a Mexican sombrero.

Students have also been warned against anything that has a sensitive historical or religious connotations. It gives the Crusades, Isis bombers, Israeli soldiers and The Prophet Mohammed as examples of costumes to avoid.

The guidance says: "Fancy Dress themes should also not be centred around political group stereotypes or the stereotypes of different levels of perceived class in the means to diminish their worth or validity.

"This again would promote an unsafe and exclusive campus to which we do not tolerate."

But the union does list cave people, aliens, Ancient Greeks and Romans, and doctors and nurses as acceptable attire choices.

Costumes of celebrities known for their sexual misconduct or abuse of power have also been banned, including the disgraced DJ Jimmy Savile and movie producer Harvey Weinstein.

Aaron Thompson, the Kent Union president, said: “Over the last few years we have received complaints over some student groups’ choice of fancy dress.

“As a result we have drafted some guidelines as a discussion point with some of our groups and as part of a proactive approach to ensure that student events remain inclusive.

“We of course want students to enjoy themselves and often host fancy dress parties in our own nightclub, but we would ask students to be mindful of their choices and whether any offence could be caused.”

He said the fancy dress policy document is currently in draft form, and will the union is seeking feedback on its proposals.
As reported by Jamie Johnson, October 17, 2018:

Waitrose is to change the name of its Gentleman’s Smoked Chicken Caesar Roll because feminist campaigners said it was sexist.

The roll, from Heston Blumenthal’s range at the supermarket, contains anchovy mayonnaise, similar to ‘gentleman’s relish’ but the name was branded “outrageous” on social media and the chain has issued an apology.

Amy Lamé, Sadiq Khan’s London night Czar posted an image of the product on Twitter and said: “I never knew sandwiches were gender specific. I’m female but thankfully Waitrose let me purchase this anyway.”

She tagged the organisation Everyday Sexism, who document instances of sexism experienced on a day to day basis.

Other people were quick to pile in with criticism of the supermarket, with Sian Murray saying: “What a ridiculous name!” and Joe Alessi calling it “outrageous”. Nikki Alvey said she was "disappointed" with the product's name.

The roll costs £3.80, but is currently on sale at a cutdown price of £2.85 and features a picture of a rooster dressed in waders holding a fishing rod with a fish at the end of the line.

Waitrose describes the roll as: “The ultimate Caesar salad to go. A parmesan ciabatta roll filled with pulled, smoked chicken breast, beechwood smoked bacon and Parmigiano Reggiano all topped with anchovy mayonnaise and Cos lettuce for crunch.”

The supermarket addressed the complaints about the product by apologising to anyone who felt offended by the name ‘Gentleman’s Smoked Chicken Caesar Roll’ and promised to change it.

A spokesperson told the Telegraph: "It's never our intention to cause offence - we're not dictating who should eat this sandwich - we hope anyone who tries it will love the distinctive flavours. However we are planning to change the name of the sandwich soon."

They did not confirm when the name change would happen, or what the new product will be called...

...The ‘Gentleman’s roll’ is not the first product to fall foul of sexism claims. Back in 2002, Nestle’s Yorkie chocolate bar launched a brash campaign in which it was labelled “Not for Girls.” The slogan stayed for ten years before being dropped quietly.
It's no wonder that schoolchildren are reporting increasing anxiety, given that the "adult" society is around them has declared war on nature and common sense. As reported by Laura Donnelly, October 9, 2018:

Schools will be asked to monitor children's happiness and mental health in a bid to tackle growing levels of anxiety among young people, the Prime Minister will announce today.

The new measures are part of a wider mental health strategy which will see thousands of therapists sent into classrooms, and annual publication of a ‘happiness index’ tracking the state of the nation’s youth.

Theresa May will also appoint the UK’s first minister for suicide prevention and £1.8m funding for the Samaritans, as she pledges to “end the stigma that has forced too many to suffer in silence”.

It comes amid concern about an epidemic of anxiety and distress among young people, with record levels of mental ill-health among a generation dealing with the fallout from social media.

Half of mental illness begins by the age of 14, and statistics due out later this year are expected to show levels far higher than has previously been recorded.

Under the plans, the Government will publish a “State of the Nation” report every year highlighting trends in young people’s mental well-being.

This will be the first time it has been given the same focus as physical health and academic attainment.

And all primary and secondary schools will be asked to regularly measure their pupils’ mental well-being, as part of lessons in relationships, sex and health education.

Officials said teachers would be expected to help young pupils to cope with modern pressures, while schools would be offered tools to help them assess pupil wellbeing.

It comes after The Daily Telegraph launched a duty of care campaign calling for more stringent regulation of sites like Facebook and Instagram, in order to protect children from harm.

A report from the National Audit Office today reveals a five-fold rise in the number of children and teenagers ending up at Accident and Emergency departments because of psychiatric problems over the last decade.

It also warns of falling numbers of child psychiatrists, at a time when demand continues to rise.

Today Mrs May will announce the launch of a new campaign to train a million people in mental health awareness, starting with a pilot in the West Midlands...

...Mrs May will announce that new mental health support teams will start working in schools across England next year.

The plans will see a new profession of healthcare professionals trained to deliver therapy in schools, and to ensure specialist help is given to those in need.

And she will appoint health minister Jackie Doyle-Price as the UK’s first minister for suicide prevention.

Around 4,500 people take their own lives each year in England and suicide remains the leading cause of death for men under 45.

In her new role, the minister will lead government efforts to cut the number of suicides, working with charities, clinicians and those personally affected by suicide.

It comes as Health Secretary Matt Hancock hosts the first ever Global Ministerial Mental Health Summit in London, attended by more than 50 countries as well as the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.
While taking what used to be considered sins or symptoms of madness and redefining them as normal and deserving of "human rights" protection from any opposing views, those who presume to define society's values are now criminalizing and pathologizing normal, although perhaps impolite, attitudes and behaviours. As reported by Martin Evans, October 17, 2018:

The drive to target hate crime is forcing police officers to spend valuable time investigating wolf-whistles, bad manners and impolite comments, a police leader has warned.

Sergeant Richard Cooke, the recently elected chairman of the West Midlands Police Federation, said forces were expected to record and follow up reports of hate crime, even when no criminal offence had taken place.

Writing in the Telegraph, Mr Cooke warns police officers would be dispatched to offer words of advice to people, but this meant they had less time to focus on "genuine crimes" such as burglary and violence.

Mr Cooke said he did not believe this was what the public expected of its police service. While applauding the principle behind protecting those at risk of hurtful abuse, officers have expressed their frustration at being drawn into what they see as social rather than criminal issues.

Mr Cooke, who represents 6,500 rank and file officers in the country's second largest police force, said: "I fear a dangerous precedent could be set, where our scant resources are skewed further and further away from the genuine crisis in public safety taking place on our urban homes and streets.

"Nobody, especially police officers, would ever want to see any elderly person or woman subjected to any sort of crime. The same goes for any other innocent member of the community. But we do have laws to address all manner of crimes and anti-social behaviour already."

Earlier this week the Home Secretary, Sajid Javid, announced that he had asked the Law Commission to consider whether misogyny and ageism should be added to the list of categories that constitute a hate crime.

It is hoped that by broadening out the definition of the offence, police and prosecutors will have more power to tackle and punish those who deliberately target vulnerable groups.

Newly published figures show how religious hate crimes rose by 40 per cent last year with attacks on Jewish people representing 12 percent of all offences.

Abuse against gay and transgender people and the disabled has also risen.

But there are increasing warnings that in the drive to identify and tackle the problem, police priorities are being impacted.

Mr Cooke said: "We all abhor and want to end genuine crimes motivated or aggravated by intolerance and prejudice. They should be investigated, and those who commit them should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, as should those who incite them."

But he went on: "Let us focus urgently on genuine crime, supported by basic evidence. Let’s not encourage people to think we can solve deep social problems or give impolite people manners.

"Are we really going to be required to routinely record, and potentially act on, incidents like a builder’s wolf whistle or an insensitive comment towards an elderly driver?

"I do not believe for one second that this is what the public, outside of the politically correct 'court of Twitter', expects or wants us to do."

South Yorkshire Police recently came in for criticism after urging people to report insults that did not necessarily constitute hate crimes.

Last month the newly elected chairman of the Police Federation, John Apter, warned that common sense policing was disappearing with officers forced to spend time intervening in trivial social media disputes rather than attending burglaries and other serious crimes.

He said it was time for a debate sensible debate about what the public expected of its police service.

"Where we get drawn into local disagreements, the argument over the remote control, the dispute in the playground, the row on Facebook it is frustrating. I certainly think police time can be better spent and it makes a mockery when we are so stretched," he said.
The immaturity and lack of self-discipline that often characterizes young people who are away from home without adult supervision for the first time is now considered a sign of mental illness, as reported by Ms. Turner, October 16, 2018:

For university students, falling asleep during lectures after staying up all night partying was once considered par for the course.

But now nodding off during classes at Buckingham University will be treated as a possible sign of a mental health disorder.

Under new plans, every member of staff at the university will be given mental health first aid training so they can spot signs of potential distress among students.

Starting from January, all university employees - from professors to cleaners, caterers and gardeners - will be enrolled on a compulsory half-day training course in mental health. They will also be able to sign up for a longer two-day course and become a mental health champion.

Dee Bunker, head of welfare at Buckingham University who is overseeing the staff training programme, said: “We will teach about the signs and symptoms of stress and of someone who is depressed: not being engaged, not attending classes, a lack of eye contact or a lack of sleep.

“If someone is anxious you may find them pale, sweating, wringing their hands or nervous. They may not be able to concentrate, look you in the eye, hold a conversation, sit still or sit in same room with you.”

Academics will be taught that if a “student is falling asleep in your lecture”, this could serve as “an indication that they are not sleeping at night” due to anxiety or depression.

"Our hope is that no member of staff would ever walk past anyone who is upset,” Ms Bunker said. “This training gives people the knowledge and confidence to say: ‘Are you ok? Is there anything I can help with?’ and signpost them towards where they can get more help.”

Ms Bunker said that staff will not be expected to diagnose mental health conditions on the spot. “It won’t make you an expert - but it means you won’t ignore someone who is distressed,” she added.

It is the latest in a series of mental health initiatives launched by Buckingham University, which will host a wellbeing in education conference this Friday.

Sir Anthony Seldon, the university's vice-Chancellor, said: "No member of staff should walk past a student clearly in distress. The aim is to save lives and we should all be playing our part.”

He has previously warned that universities are turning a blind eye to freshers’ week “excesses” and urged fellow institutions to end their “permissive” culture.

Sir Anthony, a former headmaster at Wellington College, said that said that first-year students should be offered alternative activities to parties and social events where heavy drinking and drug-taking are prevalent.

“Every student should be taught how to breathe deeply and to control the breath to manage stress,” the report said.

“Students who learn how to relax deeply and practise yoga, tai chi, pilates or other relaxation approaches develop growing resilience and confidence for life.”

His report, published last year by the Higher Education Policy Institute, outlines how to create "positive universities" also suggests first-year students take psychology courses that teach them about the importance of wellbeing and good mental health.

It suggests all students should be offered mindfulness classes, as well as a psychology programme in their first year which teaches them skills such as resilience, how to deal with emotions, build relationships and identify and use their own strengths...
Of course, it could just be that students drink and have parties because they enjoy it, and regard such activities as part of university life. The perceptive reader will notice that the Vice-Chancellor's solution involves mindfulness, a Buddhist practice masquerading as non-religious. I recommend searching the site of Lighthouse Trails Research Project for information on mindfulness.